From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 2 20:56:00 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBC0016A468 for ; Sat, 2 Feb 2008 20:56:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B13B13C448 for ; Sat, 2 Feb 2008 20:55:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m12Ktf0e004133; Sat, 2 Feb 2008 21:55:41 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id m12Ktbkm004130; Sat, 2 Feb 2008 21:55:40 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 21:55:37 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Mel In-Reply-To: <200802022111.21862.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> Message-ID: <20080202215029.X4066@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <200802022111.21862.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Looking for a Text on ZFS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2008 20:56:00 -0000 > If you review the "Not done" items @ http://wiki.freebsd.org/ZFS and still are > doubting, then http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/zfs/whatis/ describes > what the features *can* be. I got a good impression from that text what the > advantages are, but I'm too conservative to migrate myself. YMMV. very good. "CAN be" isn't very useful. while ZFS provide "virtual partitions" (which may LOOK good), it doesn't work well with 2 or more pools created out of partitions not full drives. my common config on machines with >1 drive is to make gmirror (or gmirror+gstripe) from first partitions of each drive, to store most common data, usually EXCEPT huge files, and gconcat from other partitions to store mostly big files, other rarely used things, copies of other things etc. then drives seeks mostly within first partition so it's much faster, and i have unmirrored larger space on second. with ZFS it is not possible, while it CLAIMED to completely and definitely remove all these burder about planning disk layouts.