Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 17:41:36 +0300 From: "Alexander Mogilny" <sg@astral.ntu-kpi.kiev.ua> To: "Mark Linimon" <linimon@lonesome.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [patch] Broadcom BCM5751F Gigabit Ethernet Message-ID: <7403d2a30607250741m30d8fdd8wb0055363f7bb8338@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20060724185052.GA3695@soaustin.net> References: <7403d2a30607240213v522b7f21t2e2e0e90dbe6a7c4@mail.gmail.com> <20060724185052.GA3695@soaustin.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 7/24/06, Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> wrote: > > You should send-pr(1) this so it doesn't just get lost among all the > mailing list chatter. > I have just checked the surces on my laptop using CURRENT and found that this NIC is supported in current branch. As soon as I can see from cvs repository information this NIC is supported since revision 1.49 of if_bgereg.h and 1.132 of if_bge.c (commited on Thu Jun 15 14:31:49 2006 UTC (5 weeks, 5 days ago) by glebius). This change is still not present in RELENG_6 branch. Should I write pr regarding support of this NIC in RELENG_6 branch? -- AIM-UANIC +-----[ FreeBSD ]-----+ Alexander Mogilny | The Power to Serve! | <> sg@portaone.com +---------------------+
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?7403d2a30607250741m30d8fdd8wb0055363f7bb8338>