Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 09:13:20 -0500 From: "Brian F. Feldman" <green@FreeBSD.org> To: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) Cc: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Is MTX_CONTESTED evil? Message-ID: <200403261413.i2QEDKHw001781@green.homeunix.org> In-Reply-To: Message from des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) of "Fri, 26 Mar 2004 09:47:40 %2B0100." <xzpekrgf103.fsf@dwp.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
des@des.no (Dag-Erling =3D?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=3DF8rgrav?=3D) wrote: > "Brian F. Feldman" <green@FreeBSD.org> writes: > > Well, that certainly explains the blitz of crashes I had to fix > > recently! Since INVARIANTS and WITNESS are on by default, it would > > make sense to make ADAPTIVE_MUTEX default to catch more bugs. > = > Making ADAPTIVE_MUTEXES default will not catch more bugs, it will just > piss off users. What in the world you are talking about? I didn't know that a large clas= s = of bugs existed on SMP, turned on ADAPTIVE_MUTEXES, and found those bugs.= QED. -- = Brian Fundakowski Feldman \'[ FreeBSD ]''''''''= ''\ <> green@FreeBSD.org \ The Power to Serv= e! \ Opinions expressed are my own. \,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,= ,,,,\
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200403261413.i2QEDKHw001781>