From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 25 23:35:28 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C93316A503; Thu, 25 Sep 2003 23:35:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mux2.uit.no (mux2.uit.no [129.242.5.252]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D91943F85; Thu, 25 Sep 2003 23:35:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Ingeborg.Hellemo@cc.uit.no) Received: from mangus.cc.uit.no (mangus.cc.uit.no [129.242.6.11]) by mux2.uit.no (8.12.10/8.12.10/Mux) with ESMTP id h8Q6ZOhn057735; Fri, 26 Sep 2003 08:35:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from dis.cc.uit.no (dis.cc.uit.no [129.242.6.225]) by mangus.cc.uit.no (8.12.8/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h8Q6ZInF011822; Fri, 26 Sep 2003 08:35:18 +0200 (METDST) Received: from dis.cc.uit.no (localhost.cc.uit.no [127.0.0.1]) by dis.cc.uit.no (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h8Q6ZNSc022715; Fri, 26 Sep 2003 08:35:23 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ingeborg@dis.cc.uit.no) Message-Id: <200309260635.h8Q6ZNSc022715@dis.cc.uit.no> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.6.3 04/04/2003 with nmh-1.0.4 To: "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 25 Sep 2003 12:26:20 +0930." <20030925025619.GJ10009@wantadilla.lemis.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 08:35:23 +0200 From: Ingeborg Hellemo X-Virus-Scanned: : ok X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.36 cc: questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Vinum - plex larger than volume X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 06:35:28 -0000 grog@FreeBSD.org said: > Good question. I'll need more information for that, like I ask for in the > man page or on the web site. More info: /# uname -a FreeBSD analyse.cc.uit.no 5.1-RELEASE-p6 FreeBSD 5.1-RELEASE-p6 #1: Wed Sep 24 10:02:38 CEST 2003 root@analyse.cc.uit.no:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/ANALYSE i386 No special configuration. analyse# disklabel /dev/twed0a # /dev/twed0a: 3 partitions: # size offset fstype [fsize bsize bps/cpg] a: 2734359390 0 vinum c: 2734359390 0 unused 0 0 # "raw" part, don't edit analyse# disklabel /dev/twed1a # dev/twed1a: 3 partitions: # size offset fstype [fsize bsize bps/cpg] a: 2734359390 0 vinum c: 2734359390 0 unused 0 0 # "raw" part, don't edit (We did have a problem disklabeling these disks and ended up with editing /etc/disktab) Extract of /var/log/vinum_history: 24 Sep 2003 14:35:36.389654 *** vinum started *** 24 Sep 2003 14:36:04.334261 stripe -v /dev/twed0a /dev/twed1a 24 Sep 2003 14:37:24.478720 quit Extract of /var/log/messages: Sep 24 14:35:36 analyse kernel: vinum: loaded Sep 24 14:36:04 analyse kernel: vinum: drive vinumdrive0 is up Sep 24 14:36:04 analyse kernel: vinum: drive vinumdrive1 is up Sep 24 14:36:04 analyse kernel: vinum: removing 190 blocks of partial stripe at the end of vinum0.p0 Sep 24 14:36:04 analyse kernel: vinum: vinum0.p0.s0 is up Sep 24 14:36:04 analyse kernel: vinum: vinum0.p0.s1 is up Sep 24 14:36:04 analyse kernel: vinum: vinum0.p0 is up Sep 24 14:36:04 analyse kernel: vinum: vinum0 is up On-disk configuration: IN VINOanalyse.cc.uit.novinumdrive0q?^Zq?.^]Evolume vinum0 state up plex name vinum0.p0 state up org striped 558s vol vinum0 sd name vinum0.p0.s0 drive vinumdrive0 len 2734359030s driveoffset 265s state up plex vinum0.p0 plexoffset 0s sd name vinum0.p0.s1 drive vinumdrive1 len 2734359030s driveoffset 265s state up plex vinum0.p0 plexoffset 558s IN VINOanalyse.cc.uit.novinumdrive1q?^\q?!Evolume vinum0 state up plex name vinum0.p0 state up org striped 558s vol vinum0 sd name vinum0.p0.s0 drive vinumdrive0 len 2734359030s driveoffset 265s state up plex vinum0.p0 plexoffset 0s sd name vinum0.p0.s1 drive vinumdrive1 len 2734359030s driveoffset 265s state up plex vinum0.p0 plexoffset 558s Anything else? --Ingeborg -- Ingeborg Østrem Hellemo -- ingeborg@cc.uit.no (Univ. of Tromsø, Norway)