Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 23 Aug 2009 21:42:47 +0200
From:      Thomas Backman <serenity@exscape.org>
To:        Stefan Bethke <stb@lassitu.de>
Cc:        svn-src-head@freebsd.org, Jeremie Le Hen <jeremie@le-hen.org>
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r196200 - in head: etc/mtree include sys/dev/mfi usr.sbin usr.sbin/mfiutil
Message-ID:  <FADFFF66-45F0-4B46-9AD2-509C08334884@exscape.org>
In-Reply-To: <76094077-6E36-45DF-B717-3C7884377A89@lassitu.de>
References:  <200908132318.n7DNIjvO015601@svn.freebsd.org> <20090823143840.GD61707@felucia.tataz.chchile.org> <76094077-6E36-45DF-B717-3C7884377A89@lassitu.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Aug 23, 2009, at 21:19, Stefan Bethke wrote:

>
> Am 23.08.2009 um 16:38 schrieb Jeremie Le Hen:
>
>> Wouldn't it be more reasonable to use a standard
>> suffix for all dedicated admin utility such as vidcontrol,  
>> memcontrol,
>> kbdcontrol:
>>
>> % 59# find /bin /sbin /usr/bin /usr/sbin -name \*control | wc -l
>> %       25
>> % 60# find /bin /sbin /usr/bin /usr/sbin -name \*config | wc -l
>> %       13
>
> $ find /bin /sbin /usr/bin /usr/sbin -name \*util | wc -l
>       3
>
> I'm afraid that train's left long ago.
Keep in mind that if you're on a recent build, 2/3 of those are  
mfiutil and mptutil, the two new programs in question here.

Regards,
Thomas



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?FADFFF66-45F0-4B46-9AD2-509C08334884>