From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 11 22:52:42 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67F24106564A; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 22:52:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rfarmer@predatorlabs.net) Received: from mail-qy0-f182.google.com (mail-qy0-f182.google.com [209.85.216.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB6FF8FC18; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 22:52:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk5 with SMTP id 5so1334127qyk.13 for ; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 14:52:41 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.2.202 with SMTP id 10mr1310787qak.60.1289515961072; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 14:52:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.16.199 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 14:52:41 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [128.95.133.119] In-Reply-To: <20101111214810.GH17566@michelle.cdnetworks.com> References: <201011111808.oABI8olX079570@svn.freebsd.org> <20101111183409.GA1011@pluto.vnode.local> <20101111191900.GC17566@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <20101111211808.GE17566@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <20101111214810.GH17566@michelle.cdnetworks.com> Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 14:52:41 -0800 Message-ID: From: Rob Farmer To: pyunyh@gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, Pyun YongHyeon , Joel Dahl Subject: Re: svn commit: r215132 - head/sys/dev/nfe X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 22:52:42 -0000 On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 13:48, Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > I believe you're the first one that reported real issue. Could you > give me more details about bogus traffic? I don't know what PHY I don't know how to get more info about it, but basically the switch's activity lights blink extremely fast and activity on all of the other systems times out (can't ping anything, do dns lookups, etc.). > was used with the controller but e1000phy(4) may have advertised > flow-control so the bogus traffic could be a kind of flow-control > storm triggered nfe(4)/e1000phy(4). Maybe opening a PR with > dmesg/pciconf output would be better. I have sent PR 152150 about the rest. -- Rob Farmer