Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 21 Nov 2008 12:45:48 -0500
From:      "Ansar Mohammed" <ansarm@gmail.com>
To:        "'Wojciech Puchar'" <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   RE: Kernel SMB performance
Message-ID:  <006701c94c01$01b27280$05175780$@com>
In-Reply-To: <20081121173520.A2549@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
References:  <001101c94bea$f6a94a50$e3fbdef0$@com> <20081121173520.A2549@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> 
> > We are considering using an application that uses FreeBSD web servers
> in
> > front of Windows file servers. How reliable/scalable is the kernel
> SMB
> > module?
> no idea. it worked many times when i wanted to fetch few files from
> windows. but i don't think anyone really cares very much about it being
> very well tested, bug free and high performance (i may be wrong here).

I think you are. We should care about a KERNEL module being bug free and
high performance. If not, hey why not just use DOS.





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?006701c94c01$01b27280$05175780$>