From owner-freebsd-ports Tue Mar 28 8:59:19 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (storm.freebsd.org.uk [194.242.139.170]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD49837C221; Tue, 28 Mar 2000 08:59:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from brian@Awfulhak.org) Received: from hak.lan.Awfulhak.org (hak.nat.Awfulhak.org [172.31.0.12]) by storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA68853; Tue, 28 Mar 2000 17:58:12 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from brian@Awfulhak.org) Received: from hak.lan.Awfulhak.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hak.lan.Awfulhak.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA18808; Tue, 28 Mar 2000 17:58:07 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from brian@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org) Message-Id: <200003281658.RAA18808@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 To: "Akinori -Aki- MUSHA" Cc: sos@freebsd.dk, des@flood.ping.uio.no, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, sheldonh@uunet.co.za, jkh@zippy.cdrom.com, brian@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org Subject: Re: linux_procfs port In-Reply-To: Message from "Akinori -Aki- MUSHA" of "Wed, 29 Mar 2000 00:22:48 +0900." <861z4v15mf.wl@archon.local.idaemons.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 17:58:07 +0100 From: Brian Somers Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > At Tue, 28 Mar 2000 12:52:20 +0200 (CEST), > Soren Schmidt wrote: > > > "Akinori -Aki- MUSHA" writes: > > > > I've made a clean emulators/linux_procfs port, which holds all so= urce > > > > files in it under files/ so we can maintain them within our CVS t= ree. > > > > = > > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~knu/ports/emulators/ > > > > = > > > > Please review it and report me bugs, if any. > > > > = > > > > I'll commit it if no problem. > > > = > > > Please - the decision to take linprocfs out of the tree has not yet= > > > been made (to the best of my knowledge). Marcel (maintainer of the > > > so-called linuxulator) seems to be in favor of keeping it in the tr= ee. > > = > > It has been decided that it should moved into the linuxulator, read > > the mail on the list from -core. = > > = > > -S=F8ren > = > Then, should I keep my linux_procfs port unofficial?: > = > http://people.freebsd.org/~knu/ports/emulators/linux_procfs.tar.gz > = > = > And how about `rtc'? I hacked up a port of it: > = > http://people.freebsd.org/~knu/ports/emulators/rtc.tar.gz > = > This is another kernel module which provides /dev/rtc device, which is > useful for something like VMware 2.0. > = > = > And yes, ol' VMware2 port: > = > http://people.freebsd.org/~knu/ports/emulators/vmware2.tar.gz > = > = > So, which and which are suitable for ports? Probably we should take > the time for more discussion. I think they all should be committed as ports - but after approval = from des (he's been mucked about enough for one week :0) > -- = > / > /__ __ > / ) ) ) ) / > Akinori -Aki- MUSHA aka / (_ / ( (__( > = > "If you choose not to decide you still have made a choice." -- = Brian Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour ! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message