From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 14 06:50:12 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnome@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13C5616A422 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 06:50:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mail2.fluidhosting.com [204.14.90.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B76C743D4C for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 06:50:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 76266 invoked by uid 399); 14 Jan 2006 06:50:10 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO ?192.168.1.101?) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 14 Jan 2006 06:50:10 -0000 Message-ID: <43C89F20.5090408@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 22:50:08 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060112) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pascal Hofstee References: <200601132237.k0DMbmgQ094378@repoman.freebsd.org> <43C84646.9030007@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: gnome@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, Jason Evans Subject: Re: cvs commit: src UPDATING X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 06:50:12 -0000 Pascal Hofstee wrote: > On 1/13/06, Doug Barton wrote: >> Is there a reason this message could not have gone to -current that isn't >> obvious to me ? > > I am currently using links on the gmail interface .. i tried to reply > just to jason initially and the gnome@ list ... i never saw committers > on the CC-line. S'ok, mistakes happen. I am just concerned about the growing trend of the -committers/developers mailing lists being used for things that can just as easily be discussed on the lists. Doug > On second though i probably could have kept current cc-ed as well. > -- This .signature sanitized for your protection