Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2001 21:26:56 -0700 From: "Kulraj Gurm (bosa.ca account)" <kulraj@bosa.ca> To: "Jeremiah Gowdy" <jgowdy@home.com>, "Vincent Poy" <vince@oahu.WURLDLINK.NET>, "Charles Burns" <burnscharlesn@hotmail.com> Cc: <questions@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: the AMD factor in FreeBSD Message-ID: <005e01c0c952$22d8aae0$64c8a8c0@asknet.com> References: <Pine.BSF.4.31.0104181957520.4840-100000@oahu.WURLDLINK.NET> <001b01c0c8e3$a65f78e0$015778d8@sherline.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> Thanks, I'm familiar with all of those. I guess I just wanted to >> know how they do under FreeBSD since all the sites really benchmark it >> under Windows. >It's the same. If the code is written and compiled properly, the difference >should be seen in all OSes. Slightly of topic, couldn't resist : Toms Hardware conducts a linux kernel compile in one of their benchmarks. If we have any Intel lovers out there please put you hands over your ears for the rest of this...... Their kernel compile test they find always fails on overclocked CPU's that is why the concluded that the Intel Pentium III 1133MHz CPU was essentially an overclocked 850MHz CPU. This if I remember right has been recalled and never re-released. I could find the link to Tom's archive covering this, it really is quite amusing. Sat Siri Akal, Kulraj To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?005e01c0c952$22d8aae0$64c8a8c0>