Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 10:36:49 -0800 From: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> To: Josh Carroll <josh.carroll@gmail.com> Cc: amd64@freebsd.org, Garrett Cooper <yanefbsd@gmail.com>, stable <stable@freebsd.org>, Maciej Suszko <maciej@suszko.eu> Subject: Re: -m32 broken on bi-arch amd64 systems? Message-ID: <20081223183649.GA90840@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <8cb6106e0812230955u1bd16932h7ae4ad3fc8c97f28@mail.gmail.com> References: <7d6fde3d0812222135l753daf54geb37b696c9c1cf8@mail.gmail.com> <20081223173608.068fe9d8@suszko.eu> <8cb6106e0812230955u1bd16932h7ae4ad3fc8c97f28@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 12:55:04PM -0500, Josh Carroll wrote: > > I also noticed that behavior, shouldn't compiler/linker look > > into /usr/lib32 without additional -B switch? > > -- > > regards, Maciej Suszko. > > > > I don't know if it should or should not, but I can confirm that this > behavior was around in 7.0-RELEASE, so it's been that way for quite a > while, at least in the 7 branch. > Sigh. Read the list archives. It's been this way since Peter Wemm first introduce the ability to run i386 binaries on amd64. -- Steve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20081223183649.GA90840>