From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Fri Nov 30 17:49:41 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6079114AF63 for ; Fri, 30 Nov 2018 17:49:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EC296E56A for ; Fri, 30 Nov 2018 17:49:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 1150F114AF60; Fri, 30 Nov 2018 17:49:41 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3C93114AF5F for ; Fri, 30 Nov 2018 17:49:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93C786E563 for ; Fri, 30 Nov 2018 17:49:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ADD9C117CA for ; Fri, 30 Nov 2018 17:49:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id wAUHndLI061145 for ; Fri, 30 Nov 2018 17:49:39 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id wAUHnd0P061144 for ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 30 Nov 2018 17:49:39 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 233662] graphics/djvulibre: Take MAINTAINER'ship Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 17:49:39 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: tobik@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4EC296E56A X-Spamd-Result: default: False [1.51 / 15.00]; local_wl_from(0.00)[freebsd.org]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.57)[0.567,0]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.43)[0.434,0]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.51)[0.511,0]; ASN(0.00)[asn:10310, ipnet:2001:1900:2254::/48, country:US] X-Rspamd-Server: mx1.freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 17:49:41 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D233662 --- Comment #3 from Tobias Kortkamp --- (In reply to Lorenzo Salvadore from comment #2) There is a difference on creating new ports and changing existing ports. Why are you insisting so strongly on removing the header? (In reply to Lorenzo Salvadore from comment #0) > Sorts pkg-plist alphabetically. Did not see this before. You should revert this. Your list on the Wiki says that the Porter's Handbook suggests doing this. It does not. It suggests keeping the plist sorted by *filename* (this means after the %%..%% have been expanded) not by the raw value. If in doubt, the order as output by `make makeplist` is the correct order. Everything else is fighting the available tools, which is no fun for anybody. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=