From owner-freebsd-current Fri May 28 18:20:23 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE64A14CE3; Fri, 28 May 1999 18:20:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from des@flood.ping.uio.no) Received: (from des@localhost) by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.1) id DAA07970; Sat, 29 May 1999 03:20:09 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from des) To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Cc: Dag-Erling Smorgrav , asami@FreeBSD.ORG (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami), junkmale@xtra.co.nz, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FTP passive mode - a new default? References: <17591.927940436@zippy.cdrom.com> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 29 May 1999 03:20:08 +0200 In-Reply-To: "Jordan K. Hubbard"'s message of "Fri, 28 May 1999 18:13:56 -0700" Message-ID: Lines: 12 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.5/Emacs 19.34 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG "Jordan K. Hubbard" writes: > > If we just set FTP_PASSIVE_MODE=YES in /etc/login.conf or > > /etc/profile, all the user needs to do is set FTP_PASSIVE_MODE=NO > > before trying to fetch the port. > Heh, no. UTSL. All the code which checks this, checks to see if it's > set to anything at all, not if it's set explicitly to YES. :) In that case, the source is wrong. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message