From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 11 16:10:58 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 367F616A4CE for ; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 16:10:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from watcher.puryear-it.com (ip-66-186-248-99.static.eatel.net [66.186.248.99]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD73343D2F for ; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 16:10:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dap99@i-55.com) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by watcher.puryear-it.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C015134D2F for ; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 11:04:16 -0500 (CDT) Received: from watcher.puryear-it.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (watcher.puryear-it.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 03285-02 for ; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 11:04:13 -0500 (CDT) Received: by watcher.puryear-it.com (Postfix, from userid 1003) id 09EE434F20; Thu, 10 Jun 2004 21:25:00 -0500 (CDT) Received: from yourqqh4336axf (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by watcher.puryear-it.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 2959834D88 for ; Thu, 10 Jun 2004 21:25:00 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <001401c44f5c$0ae657f0$6501a8c0@yourqqh4336axf> From: "adp" To: Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 21:30:04 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2739.300 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new Subject: rpc.statd needs a lot of memory? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 16:10:58 -0000 I am running FreeBSD 4.9. We have several NFS clients and one server. On all machines we are running rpc.statd. I noticed that the size is around 257MB, although res is usually only around 460KB so this isn't a big problem. Why is the size so large though?