Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 27 Mar 2014 12:59:09 +0100
From:      Rusmir Dusko <nemysis@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Antoine Brodin <antoine@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r347539 - in head: biology/genpak biology/rasmol cad/chipmunk databases/typhoon databases/xmbase-grok devel/asl devel/flick devel/happydoc devel/ixlib devel/p5-Penguin-Easy editors/axe ...
Message-ID:  <20140327125909.6b102c8d@nemysis3now>
In-Reply-To: <20140327111602.GA57802@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <201403082226.s28MQMtI079354@svn.freebsd.org> <20140327111602.GA57802@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 27 Mar 2014 11:16:02 +0000
Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> wrote:

> On Sat, Mar 08, 2014 at 10:26:22PM +0000, Antoine Brodin wrote:
> > New Revision: 347539
> > URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/347539
> > QAT: https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/r347539/
> > 
> > Log:
> >   Deprecate a few unmaintained ports (leaf ports, non staged and
> >   unmaintained since more than 12 years)
> 
> Antoine,
> 
> Can you clarify a bit on what does "unmaintained" mean in this context?
> Does it mean dead upstream, or MAINTAINER=ports@?
> 
> If it's the former, I'm fine with it, but deprecating unbroken, possibly
> alive ports merely based on MAINTAINER lines does not seem right to me.
> 
> E.g. I've set a few of my ports free (that is, relinquished control over to
> ports@) to let others do occasional updates or minor tweaks without having
> to wait for me to approve their changes.  It works well enough for simple
> ports that are hard to damage by careless committing which had sadly become
> quite popular recently.
> 
> ./danfe
> 


True when is Upstream alive and not Port have one maintainer, then is good to
have these Ports.

Not all Ports must have one maintainer. Please not so simple deprecate good Port.

When is games@ team full released all ports@ games is good to move to games@.
No problem for all to update this only to sent one email and get approval

This is good for all other team@


I have already adopted more ports@ mostly games but to others


Have just checked all deprecated games Ports

This Ports have Upstream which is alive

games/crossfire-server

games/tinymux



This are old good cult games and needed

games/sokoban

games/xbattle

games/xkoules

games/xvier



Have too checked graphics

These Ports have Upstream which is alive

graphics/maverik

a bit older

graphics/xmorph


This is old one from libpng

graphics/tiff2png


This are old one, but someone perhaps need it

graphics/claraocr

graphics/dc20ctrl

graphics/kdc2tiff

graphics/opendis

graphics/plotmtv

graphics/qvplay

graphics/xmfract



-- 
Best regards,
Rusmir Dusko



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140327125909.6b102c8d>