Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 09 Apr 2001 08:57:25 +0900
From:      itojun@iijlab.net
To:        Gunther Schadow <gunther@aurora.regenstrief.org>
Cc:        snap-users@kame.net, users@ipv6.org, net@freebsd.org, ipfw@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Consolidating KAME SPD rules and IPFW / IPfilter. 
Message-ID:  <2683.986774245@coconut.itojun.org>
In-Reply-To: gunther's message of Sun, 08 Apr 2001 05:10:46 GMT. <3ACFF2D6.13219EAB@aurora.regenstrief.org> 

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
>I am tempted to "outsource" the IPsec functionality away from the
>kernel using a demon on a divert socket, just like NATD. This would
>be more modular and keeps the kernel from panicing because of bugs
>in IPsec -- I did have embarrassing kernel crashes, just when I bragged
>about FreeBSD running rock solid :0(.

	checking - did you have kernel panics in kernel IPsec code (then pls
	send-pr), or you are just talking about an example?

itojun

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ipfw" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2683.986774245>