From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 14 17:05:32 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68D9AB08 for ; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 17:05:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steve@sohara.org) Received: from uk1rly2283.eechost.net (uk1rly2283-a.eechost.net [217.69.47.231]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 302A227D2 for ; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 17:05:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [31.186.37.179] (helo=smtp.marelmo.com) by uk1rly2283.eechost.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1VVlYx-0001w8-52 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 18:04:11 +0100 Received: from [192.168.63.1] (helo=steve.marelmo.com) by smtp.marelmo.com with smtp (Exim 4.80.1 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1VVla7-000D7d-Az for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 17:05:23 +0000 Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 18:05:23 +0100 From: Steve O'Hara-Smith To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Tuning /etc/sysctl.conf Message-Id: <20131014180523.39507ca78fbe96e16d9d0e04@sohara.org> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.3.0 (GTK+ 2.24.19; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Auth-Info: 15567@permanet.ie (plain) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 17:05:32 -0000 On Mon, 14 Oct 2013 18:35:49 +0200 Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina wrote: > Hi people, > > I'm very interested to tuning /etc/sysctl.conf according to the > specifications of my PC. As a general rule it is more appropriate to think of tuning in terms of the workload you intend to apply to your PC. Most changes you can make will benefit some workflows at the cost of making others less efficient. -- Steve O'Hara-Smith