From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 28 13:47:19 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EB651065676 for ; Thu, 28 May 2009 13:47:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net (kanga.honeypot.net [IPv6:2001:470:a80a:1:21f:d0ff:fe22:b8a8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2E408FC12 for ; Thu, 28 May 2009 13:47:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A17F1FC30 for ; Thu, 28 May 2009 08:47:18 -0500 (CDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at honeypot.net Received: from kanga.honeypot.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (kanga.honeypot.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xZ+Oe--HYRbK for ; Thu, 28 May 2009 08:47:16 -0500 (CDT) Received: from athena.localnet (athena.daycos.com [IPv6:2001:470:c054:1:221:9bff:fe00:de3f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CD5A61FC29 for ; Thu, 28 May 2009 08:47:15 -0500 (CDT) From: Kirk Strauser To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 08:47:12 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.11.3 (Linux/2.6.28-11-generic; KDE/4.2.3; x86_64; ; ) References: <200905281030.n4SAUXdA046386@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200905280847.12966.kirk@strauser.com> Subject: Re: Remotely edit user disk quota X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 13:47:19 -0000 On Thursday 28 May 2009 06:13:11 am Wojciech Puchar wrote: > rsh is as secure as the communication channel. If it can be considered > secure - DO USE rsh, because it's fastest as it doesn't have any > encryption overhead. Are you on a 386? -- Kirk Strauser