Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1998 17:51:49 -0800 (PST) From: Studded <Studded@gorean.org> To: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> Cc: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc rc.conf Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9812211746590.5738-100000@dt053n73.san.rr.com> In-Reply-To: <199812220144.RAA48786@apollo.backplane.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 21 Dec 1998, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> named.conf does not have sufficient functionality to fix the interface
> scanning problem.
If you would, please define more precisely what you mean by "the
interface scanning problem." What I understood you to mean in your last
post was that you didn't want BIND scanning interfaces after startup
because that wreaked havoc with the sandbox situation. That problem is
neatly solved by defining interface-interval to zero. If you are concerned
about other problems, I apologize for misunderstanding the question.
> The existing mechanism allows you to specify a
> network/mask filter to filter out what results from the interface scan
> actually get bound to, but this fails in a number of situations including
> situations where you want to bind to interface aliases.
I have never had a problem specifying which aliases I want BIND to
bind to, and which ones I don't. YMMV of course.
Doug
--
Now you sailors know where your women come for love.
"Zoot Suit Riot" - Cherry Poppin' Daddies
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.9812211746590.5738-100000>