Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 02:37:30 +0200 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org> To: perryh@pluto.rain.com Cc: jmc-freebsd@milibyte.co.uk, dougb@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, sonic2000gr@gmail.com Subject: Re: PACKAGESITE Message-ID: <487A9FCA.8010303@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <487a99e5.J/H87TLmSKivtwA7%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <48798b9d.0bgmwrViDqPyEGdk%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <4879bdce.y5h8w8XA%2Bd8w3XuK%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <4879C26D.1020901@gmail.com> <200807131016.31598.jmc-freebsd@milibyte.co.uk> <4879D026.8060407@gmail.com> <487a99e5.J/H87TLmSKivtwA7%perryh@pluto.rain.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
perryh@pluto.rain.com wrote: >>>> As far as I know, pkg_add will only fetch dependencies recursively >>>> from the Internet when used with -r but it will then ignore >>>> PKG_PATH. Seems what you are asking cannot be done this way ... >>> I wonder if portinstall -P (or even -PP) might do what the OP >>> wants? >> You are correct, according to the man page, portinstall -PP would >> be his best bet. > > Except that portinstall is part of portupgrade, which has its own > boatload of dependencies. You must be used to sailing in very small boats. Kris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?487A9FCA.8010303>