Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 5 May 2000 11:37:08 -0500 (CDT)
From:      Brennan W Stehling <brennan@offwhite.net>
To:        Mitch Collinsworth <mkc@Graphics.Cornell.EDU>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: low cost consultant (?) 
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.10.10005051131280.58641-100000@home.offwhite.net>
In-Reply-To: <200005051629.MAA45752@larryboy.graphics.cornell.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This was over 6 months ago.  FreeBSD may have supported it, but that was
not listed as a supported OS.  Linux was listed, however, and I had to go
with that.  We really needed that autoloader as that workstation was where
I worked and I had it pulling backups from all of the other servers on the
network via nfs and smb and dumping the backup to tape.

Doing that with another tape drive would have been very difficult since
the other ones that claimed to have support in FreeBSD did not have the
capacity or the speed of this Sony autoloader.

But in the end, the autoloader did not actually work correctly.  I had a
seasoned Unix consultant come in to help me from time to time and he could
not get it to work the way we wanted either.

In order to get the drive to do exactly what we wanted we would have to
use Windows NT and I was not about to put that on my workstation.

Just another case where the hardware vendor will not take the time to
create a driver or provide specs to *BSD developers since that user base
is still too small.


Brennan Stehling - web developer and sys admin
projects: www.greasydaemon.com | www.onmilwaukee.com | www.sncalumni.com

fortune:
Living on Earth may be expensive, but it includes an annual free trip
around the Sun.

On Fri, 5 May 2000, Mitch Collinsworth wrote:

> 
> >I agree that FreeBSD should not lose focus as a server OS, but if there
> >were a larger user base we would find more hardware vendors working for
> >FreeBSD users.  I wish that every autoloader tape drive out there had a
> >FreeBSD driver, but they hardly ever support FreeBSD.
> >
> >The last time I had to use a nice new autoloader tape drive I had to use
> >Linux because it happened to have support while FreeBSD did not.
> >
> >It is all about the numbers for hardware vendors.
> 
> Is your autoloader a scsi device?  Don't most modern scsi autoloaders
> conform to the scsi media changer interface standard at this point,
> making custom drivers unnecessary?
> 
> Maybe what I really should be asking is "How long ago was it when you
> 'had to use Linux'"?  Perhaps it was before the scsi media changer
> interface standard came into common usage.
> 
> -Mitch
> 



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.10.10005051131280.58641-100000>