Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 28 Aug 2011 07:07:43 -0400
From:      Steve Wills <swills@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Stanislav Sedov <stas@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        ruby@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: ruby-gems update
Message-ID:  <4E5A217F.4050105@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20110828030354.a53bf2ed.stas@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <20110828030354.a53bf2ed.stas@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

On 08/28/11 06:03, Stanislav Sedov wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> I'd like to update our ruby-gems versio to 1.8.7.
> Are there any objections?  It seems that everything is
> working fine with this version, and it includes a lot of
> bugfixes, including better behaviour with ruby 1.9.2.
> 
> I'm attaching the patch I'm planning to commit.  If there's
> no objection, I will commit it tomorrow.
> 
> The patch also fixes the issue when rdocs were not installed
> due to unexsisting directory (it also produced a broken plist
> when you already had this directory, because it would not
> include those files).
> 
> Thanks!
> 

You read my mind. This looks good to me, thanks!

Long term I think we should consider a move away from using the version
prefixes and support only one version of ruby installed at a time.

Steve
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (FreeBSD)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJOWiF/AAoJEPXPYrMgexuhStAH/3oW1ysgKdd1qWnx79WS1ywE
Dd7CJu8o0TBfUyLPpRhhaKcFel2jnq2bziBC9Av6gxSjkjZbSFCMqNd1dm0EgO76
MFjEJ/anF7sKo3gzBKR7SXjFSZZ+RW0rTJ8lB8UiCfp60tgZJvBLyjCJaBa4+VE2
KrToVlAmuTS1c+4h0ELQn0seF//rfvXSGNon8X72jcGu35IKSg8Ftjx4o4ZJdojr
7C6w0XGcp1aZUdJqyfKMW3FWBEp5561YHJSOgRSwD211ysWShX8GBBMJ0bWCBo6L
IemDotDo1CLSEDvM9CR4Zsk3Z//dJJVYd4Z3nLVrQNi48z+Om69GKCLIjzO9HjM=
=1uZ6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4E5A217F.4050105>