Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 27 Nov 2003 14:49:35 -0800
From:      Kent Stewart <kstewart@owt.com>
To:        Bill Moran <wmoran@potentialtech.com>, walt <wa1ter@myrealbox.com>
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Turkeys and dynamic linking
Message-ID:  <200311271449.35193.kstewart@owt.com>
In-Reply-To: <3FC65F2D.50404@potentialtech.com>
References:  <3FC65B59.6060405@myrealbox.com> <3FC65F2D.50404@potentialtech.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thursday 27 November 2003 12:31 pm, Bill Moran wrote:
> walt wrote:
> > To all of you who celebrate Thanksgiving today, I wish you a happy one!
> >
> > And speaking of turkeys, does anyone know how Microsoft handles the
> > performance issues associated with dynamic linking?  Do they do
> > anything special, or just ignore the whole thing?
>
> Don't they fix the performance hit by moving performance-critical parts
> of the application into kernel space (such as IIS and MSSQL)?
>
> At least, that's what Eric Raymond claims in his latest book.  I don't
> think that's an approach I would like to see FreeBSD take.

It all depends because if you only have 1 dll loaded for multiple 
applications, which is one of the features I understand is built into 
Windows, you have real savings. You share the code and own the data.

Kent

-- 
Kent Stewart
Richland, WA

http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200311271449.35193.kstewart>