From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Jun 30 13:47:27 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id NAA15260 for questions-outgoing; Mon, 30 Jun 1997 13:47:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Ilsa.StevesCafe.com (Ilsa.StevesCafe.com [205.168.119.129]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA15255 for ; Mon, 30 Jun 1997 13:47:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Ilsa.StevesCafe.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by Ilsa.StevesCafe.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA18518 for ; Mon, 30 Jun 1997 14:47:01 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <199706302047.OAA18518@Ilsa.StevesCafe.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0gamma 1/27/96 From: Steve Passe To: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Support for SMP ? (Multi processors ?) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 30 Jun 1997 14:47:00 -0600 Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Hi, > It does, but only under 3.0-current. This means it's not very stable > either (still under development). You can try it out if you want though. I wouldn't catagorize it as "not very stable" at this point. I have a development system that runs weeks at a time without problems. It does have all the day-to-day problems that running -current can cause, but is nearly as stable as 3.0-current is in general. -- Steve Passe | powered by smp@csn.net | Symmetric MultiProcessor FreeBSD