Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2000 11:57:58 -0500 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <n@nectar.com> To: Dan Nelson <dnelson@emsphone.com> Cc: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>, Seigo Tanimura <tanimura@r.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: pw_class in _pw_passwd is null if __hashpw() is not called in prior Message-ID: <20000928115758.E42464@spawn.nectar.com> In-Reply-To: <20000928102400.A17446@dan.emsphone.com>; from dnelson@emsphone.com on Thu, Sep 28, 2000 at 10:24:01AM -0500 References: <20000906151431.A26152@hamlet.nectar.com> <14798.4853.288090.72159A@silver.carrots.uucp.r.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp> <20000924100812.A23848@spawn.nectar.com> <200009281350.WAA23538@bunko> <200009281513.LAA82640@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> <20000928102400.A17446@dan.emsphone.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Sep 28, 2000 at 10:24:01AM -0500, Dan Nelson wrote: > Depends on what Seigo meant. If he meant that libc.so.4 and no > /etc/nsswitch.conf implicitly adds a "+" to the end of /etc/passwd, > that's definitely a bug. If you don't have an /etc/nsswitch.conf, then it behaves just like libc.so.3, i.e. only the files are consulted, unless you have a '+' entry. > If he meant that libc.so.4 and an nsswitch.conf of "passwd: files nis" > doesn't require a "+", that's fine. And that is how it works if you do have an nsswitch.conf like that. -- Jacques Vidrine / n@nectar.com / jvidrine@verio.net / nectar@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000928115758.E42464>