From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 17 00:02:33 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB7A137B401; Tue, 17 Jun 2003 00:02:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from exchhz01.viatech.com.cn (ip-167-164-97-218.anlai.com [218.97.164.167]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B7BB43F75; Tue, 17 Jun 2003 00:02:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from davidxu@viatech.com.cn) Received: from davidw2k (ip-184-1-168-192.rev.dyxnet.com [192.168.1.184]) by exchhz01.viatech.com.cn with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2650.21) id M4G4BX40; Tue, 17 Jun 2003 14:46:37 +0800 Message-ID: <006e01c3349e$d141bf90$b801a8c0@davidw2k> From: "David Xu" To: "Scott Long" References: <200306150031.h5F0VPse055534@repoman.freebsd.org> <3EEE0F0C.3030205@freebsd.org> <001501c33465$04b11040$0701a8c0@tiger> <3EEE9D7F.2080406@freebsd.org> Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 15:05:21 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4910.0300 cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org cc: src-committers@freebsd.org cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/alpha/alpha trap.c src/sys/alpha/linux linux_sysvec.c src/sys/amd64/amd64 pmap.c trap.c src/sys/compat/svr4 svr4_sysvec.c src/sys/ddb db_ps.c src/sys/fs/procfs procfs_status.c src/sys/i386/i386 pmap.c ... X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 07:02:34 -0000 Sorry, I am too pugnacious. :-) David Xu ----- Original Message -----=20 From: "Scott Long" To: "David Xu" Cc: ; ; = Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 12:47 PM Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/alpha/alpha trap.c src/sys/alpha/linux = linux_sysvec.c src/sys/amd64/amd64 pmap.c trap.c src/sys/compat/svr4 = svr4_sysvec.c src/sys/ddb db_ps.c src/sys/fs/procfs procfs_status.c = src/sys/i386/i386 pmap.c ... > I apologize for coming on stronger than I meant. It likely comes > down to personal style, so there is no use in wasting effort arguing > about it. >=20 > Scott >=20 > David Xu wrote: > > What does KSE mean ? I think kse is only useful for > > scheduler, I would like it disappears in kse_thread.c > > and only becomes a scheduler private data structure, > > current kern_thread.c is forced to manage kse data > > structure but no code is really using it in that file. > > Julian even ever said ksegrp should be a subproc, > > I think he is right.=20 > > If someone want to implement another SA, feel free to > > do, but there is no reason that our SA implement > > should be called P_KSE and a future not implemented yet > > should be called P_SA or P_SAxxx. :( > >=20 > > David Xu