Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2016 21:35:09 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ruby@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 196326] rubygem framework bug : building occurs in stage phase Message-ID: <bug-196326-21402-ZgPHDx2o3B@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-196326-21402@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-196326-21402@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D196326 --- Comment #8 from John Marino <marino@FreeBSD.org> --- (In reply to Mathieu Arnold from comment #7) "As they are all built using USES=3Dgem, I'll let you wonder who is in char= ge of the build thing." Why be coy? I asked a serious question and I would have like the respect o= f a serious answer. Mk/Uses/gem.mk is listed as "portmgr" for maintainer. I k= now for a fact that portmgr as a unit doesn't think rubygem framework is behavi= ng correctly. "Technically, there can be no timeout, ever, on issues regarding the framework." This is actually a major issue and potential source of abuse that I hope is rectified in the future. Nobody should have the ability to block good work= for "reasons". This bug report is coming up on 2 years of age. I would like to discuss the potential fixes of this but the person in charge should be revealed. If not, I will (begrudgingly) offer a solid fix for th= is 2 year old PR and I would like it not to be blocked without a good reason.=20 Aren't I doing everything correctly so far? If not, what should I be doing instead? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-196326-21402-ZgPHDx2o3B>