Date: Sat, 9 Nov 1996 22:46:58 -0500 (EST) From: Chuck Robey <chuckr@glue.umd.edu> To: Igor Roshchin <str@giganda.komkon.org> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: wwwcount-2.3 Message-ID: <Pine.OSF.3.95.961109224225.8618B-100000@packet.eng.umd.edu> In-Reply-To: <199611100225.FAA00465@nagual.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 10 Nov 1996, [KOI8-R] =E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA =FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7 wrote: > >=20 > > Andrey, > >=20 > > one more comment /question > > about $Subj. > >=20 > > INSTALL_MAN > > INSTALL_SCRIPT > > INSTALL_PROGRAM > > being used in Makefile are undefined. I've checked, and if everyone running 2.1 and 2.1.5 would grab a copy of current's bsd.port.mk, it has no negative impact, and will eliminate the majority of build failures for new ports. There are a small subset of ports that depend on differences in /usr/include and whatnot, but that's a real small subset. Good Advice: update your bsd.port.mk file in /usr/share/mk. >=20 > Ports are for -current only. >=20 > --=20 > Andrey A. Chernov > <ache@nagual.ru> > http://www.nagual.ru/~ache/ I took Andrey off the CC: list, he runs current anyhow, and he knows this to begin with. >=20 ----------------------------+----------------------------------------------= - Chuck Robey | Interests include any kind of voice or data= =20 chuckr@eng.umd.edu | communications topic, C programming, and Unix= =2E 9120 Edmonston Ct #302 | Greenbelt, MD 20770 | I run Journey2 and n3lxx, both FreeBSD (301) 220-2114 | version 2.2 current -- and great FUN! ----------------------------+----------------------------------------------= -
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.OSF.3.95.961109224225.8618B-100000>