Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 26 Mar 2014 23:17:32 +0100
From:      John Marino <freebsd.contact@marino.st>
To:        Antoine Brodin <antoine@FreeBSD.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org,  svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r349288 - head/archivers/ocaml-bz2
Message-ID:  <533351FC.2020908@marino.st>
In-Reply-To: <201403262018.s2QKId7b067131@svn.freebsd.org>
References:  <201403262018.s2QKId7b067131@svn.freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 3/26/2014 21:18, Antoine Brodin wrote:
> Author: antoine
> Date: Wed Mar 26 20:18:38 2014
> New Revision: 349288
> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/349288
> QAT: https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/r349288/
> 
> Log:
>   Stage support
> 
> Modified:
>   head/archivers/ocaml-bz2/Makefile
> 
> Modified: head/archivers/ocaml-bz2/Makefile
> ==============================================================================
> --- head/archivers/ocaml-bz2/Makefile	Wed Mar 26 20:09:29 2014	(r349287)
> +++ head/archivers/ocaml-bz2/Makefile	Wed Mar 26 20:18:38 2014	(r349288)
> @@ -12,10 +12,9 @@ DISTNAME=	caml${PORTNAME}-${PORTVERSION}
>  MAINTAINER=	jaapb@kerguelen.org
>  COMMENT=	OCaml library to manipulate bz2 files
>  
> +DESTDIRNAME=	DONTUSEIT
>  GNU_CONFIGURE=	yes
>  USES=		gmake
> -NO_STAGE=	yes
> -

You left USE_OCAML_LDCONFIG=     yes.
Won't this create an ldconf file that will get added to plist and will
conflict potentially with the real ldconf?

USE_OCAML_WASH is also set.  Is this knob actually desireable?  Why is
it needed if it's competing with pkg to remove files?

I'm not saying I'm right, I'm just trying to learn this.
John





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?533351FC.2020908>