From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 17 00:06:09 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E741C16A4CE for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2005 00:06:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mp2.macomnet.net (mp2.macomnet.net [195.128.64.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C60C243D48 for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2005 00:06:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from maxim@macomnet.ru) Received-SPF: pass (mp2.macomnet.net: domain of maxim@macomnet.ru designates 127.0.0.1 as permitted sender) receiver=mp2.macomnet.net; client_ip=127.0.0.1; envelope-from=maxim@macomnet.ru; Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mp2.macomnet.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j2H00sAG070172; Thu, 17 Mar 2005 03:00:54 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from maxim@macomnet.ru) Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 03:00:53 +0300 (MSK) From: Maxim Konovalov To: Nerius Landys In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20050317025907.G69637@mp2.macomnet.net> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: transparent bridge and ARP proxy confusion X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 00:06:10 -0000 [...] > On host 192.168.0.2, the tcpdump output: > > 00:10:53.445868 0:2:b3:da:50:ba Broadcast arp 60: > arp who-has 192.168.0.2 tell 192.168.0.6 > 00:10:53.445888 0:e:c:68:e3:94 0:2:b3:da:50:ba arp 42: > arp reply 192.168.0.2 is-at 0:e:c:68:e3:94 > 00:10:53.446615 0:2:b3:da:50:bb 0:e:c:68:e3:94 ip 98: > 192.168.0.6 > 192.168.0.2: icmp: echo request > 00:10:53.446634 0:e:c:68:e3:94 0:2:b3:da:50:ba ip 98: > 192.168.0.2 > 192.168.0.6: icmp: echo reply > 00:10:58.442471 0:e:c:68:e3:94 0:2:b3:da:50:ba arp 42: > arp who-has 192.168.0.6 tell 192.168.0.2 > 00:10:58.442925 0:2:b3:da:50:bb 0:e:c:68:e3:94 arp 60: > arp reply 192.168.0.6 is-at 0:2:b3:da:50:bb What's the behaviour is observed with TCP or UDP? Is it the same? -- Maxim Konovalov