Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 14:04:53 +0200 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> To: Alexander Best <arundel@freebsd.org> Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@freebsd.org>, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, Dmitry Morozovsky <marck@rinet.ru>, Xin LI <delphij@freebsd.org>, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r213398 - head/bin/rm Message-ID: <AANLkTinoY232bRsut7swz3h-uJ5nXURgG7Tqhn7wGho7@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20101004114248.GA16641@freebsd.org> References: <201010040617.o946HkOO002409@svn.freebsd.org> <20101004092559.GB7322@garage.freebsd.pl> <20101004095845.GA99361@freebsd.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1010041435200.95088@woozle.rinet.ru> <20101004104257.GH7322@garage.freebsd.pl> <20101004114248.GA16641@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 4 October 2010 13:42, Alexander Best <arundel@freebsd.org> wrote: > good point. ZFS should really be added to the list and LFS should go away. are > there any other relevant filesystems without a fixed-block size that need to be > mentioned? what about afs? or tmpfs? (it's not that the block sizes aren't fixed, it's that the assignment of blocks to the file is not fixed).
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTinoY232bRsut7swz3h-uJ5nXURgG7Tqhn7wGho7>