Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 13:13:34 -0400 (EDT) From: Randy Schultz <schulra@earlham.edu> To: Derek Ragona <derek@computinginnovations.com> Cc: Grant Peel <gpeel@thenetnow.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Anti Spam Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.64.0704211305380.2138@tdream.lly.earlham.edu> In-Reply-To: <6.0.0.22.2.20070420163700.025578a8@mail.computinginnovations.com> References: <002001c7836b$06534bd0$6501a8c0@GRANT> <6.0.0.22.2.20070420163700.025578a8@mail.computinginnovations.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007, Derek Ragona spaketh thusly: -} -}If your volume of mail is >50000 per day don't use the baracuda. It won't -}keep up. I think this greatly depends on the model. I've not used the 200 but it certainly is a small box. My experience shows the 600 could easily handle this per hour. I suspect the 400 could handle 50k/day w/o trouble. (and no, I have never worked for Barracuda, nor do I have any stock in them. ;) -- Randy (schulra@earlham.edu) 765.983.1283 <*> Rain puts a hole in stone because of its constancy, not its force. - H. Joseph Gerber
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.64.0704211305380.2138>