From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 14 16:17:05 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A9CC16A407; Sat, 14 Oct 2006 16:17:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Tor.Egge@cvsup.no.freebsd.org) Received: from pil.idi.ntnu.no (pil.idi.ntnu.no [129.241.107.93]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A007B43D58; Sat, 14 Oct 2006 16:17:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Tor.Egge@cvsup.no.freebsd.org) Received: from cvsup.no.freebsd.org (c2h5oh.idi.ntnu.no [129.241.103.69]) by pil.idi.ntnu.no (8.13.6/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k9EGH1SI008220 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 14 Oct 2006 18:17:02 +0200 (MEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cvsup.no.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k9EGH1sO087499; Sat, 14 Oct 2006 16:17:01 GMT (envelope-from Tor.Egge@cvsup.no.freebsd.org) Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 16:16:42 +0000 (UTC) Message-Id: <20061014.161642.74667667.Tor.Egge@cvsup.no.freebsd.org> To: phk@phk.freebsd.dk From: Tor Egge In-Reply-To: <4932.1160805676@critter.freebsd.dk> References: <200610132049.k9DKnObw045731@repoman.freebsd.org> <4932.1160805676@critter.freebsd.dk> X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned-By: mimedefang.idi.ntnu.no, using CLAMD X-SMTP-From: Sender=, Relay/Client=c2h5oh.idi.ntnu.no [129.241.103.69], EHLO=cvsup.no.freebsd.org X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.48 on 129.241.107.38 X-Scanned-By: mimedefang.idi.ntnu.no, using MIMEDefang 2.48 with local filter 16.42-idi X-Filter-Time: 0 seconds Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern kern_conf.c X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 16:17:05 -0000 > This is quite likely to not happen without intervention. It might > be a good idea to to deliver a signal to the process, if we can find it. The process might have been woken but not yet scheduled due to the caller of destroy_dev() having called something similar to the purge method before calling destroy_dev(). > Better of course would be more purge methods. Agreed. Pseudo ttys currently lack a purge method. - Tor Egge