Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 19 Nov 2003 08:51:27 +0100
From:      Lutz Kittler <Lutz.Kittler@sse-erfurt.de>
To:        freebsd-isdn@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: how dangerous would it be to switch to 5.1-current?
Message-ID:  <200311190851.27401.Lutz.Kittler@sse-erfurt.de>
In-Reply-To: <20031118210148.GA98520@gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de>
References:  <200311181733.hAIHXN4X096374@www.kukulies.org> <20031118223226.T17712@nihil.reifenberger.com> <20031118210148.GA98520@gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Am Dienstag, 18. November 2003 22:01 schrieb Christoph P. Kukulies:
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 10:36:39PM +0100, Michael Reifenberger wrote:
> > On Tue, 18 Nov 2003, C. Kukulies wrote:
> > > Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 18:33:23 +0100 (CET)
> > > From: C. Kukulies <kuku@www.kukulies.org>
> > > To: freebsd-isdn@freebsd.org
> > > Subject: how dangerous would it be to switch to 5.1-current?
> > >
> > > With a gateway machine that runs 4.8 stable I'm considering to
> > > switch to 5.1-current (cvsup) at the danger of being off-net
> > > after the upgrade. Should I?
> >
> > Too dangerous.
> > If you ask this question ('cause you havn't tried), you shouldn't
> > upgrade. At least not to -current. Maybe RELENG_4.
>
> Well, I have gone through a couple of such situations in the past since
> 386bsd :-)
>
> It's just the question whether i4b still works or works again
> under -current. Under 5.0 there were problems due to timer changes
> in the kernel.
>
> Is anybody running i4b under -current?
>
> --
> Chris Christoph P. U. Kukulies kuku_at_physik.rwth-aachen.de

Hi,

I am running 5.1 current with AVM Fritz PCI. No problems so far.

 lutz



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200311190851.27401.Lutz.Kittler>