Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 08:51:27 +0100 From: Lutz Kittler <Lutz.Kittler@sse-erfurt.de> To: freebsd-isdn@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how dangerous would it be to switch to 5.1-current? Message-ID: <200311190851.27401.Lutz.Kittler@sse-erfurt.de> In-Reply-To: <20031118210148.GA98520@gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de> References: <200311181733.hAIHXN4X096374@www.kukulies.org> <20031118223226.T17712@nihil.reifenberger.com> <20031118210148.GA98520@gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Am Dienstag, 18. November 2003 22:01 schrieb Christoph P. Kukulies: > On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 10:36:39PM +0100, Michael Reifenberger wrote: > > On Tue, 18 Nov 2003, C. Kukulies wrote: > > > Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 18:33:23 +0100 (CET) > > > From: C. Kukulies <kuku@www.kukulies.org> > > > To: freebsd-isdn@freebsd.org > > > Subject: how dangerous would it be to switch to 5.1-current? > > > > > > With a gateway machine that runs 4.8 stable I'm considering to > > > switch to 5.1-current (cvsup) at the danger of being off-net > > > after the upgrade. Should I? > > > > Too dangerous. > > If you ask this question ('cause you havn't tried), you shouldn't > > upgrade. At least not to -current. Maybe RELENG_4. > > Well, I have gone through a couple of such situations in the past since > 386bsd :-) > > It's just the question whether i4b still works or works again > under -current. Under 5.0 there were problems due to timer changes > in the kernel. > > Is anybody running i4b under -current? > > -- > Chris Christoph P. U. Kukulies kuku_at_physik.rwth-aachen.de Hi, I am running 5.1 current with AVM Fritz PCI. No problems so far. lutz
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200311190851.27401.Lutz.Kittler>