From owner-freebsd-isdn@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 18 23:51:32 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-isdn@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FBA816A4CE for ; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 23:51:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.arcor-ip.de (mail1.arcor-ip.de [145.253.2.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 044F843FE5 for ; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 23:51:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Lutz.Kittler@sse-erfurt.de) Received: from mail.sse-erfurt.de (145.253.64.194) by mail1.arcor-ip.de (5.5.034) id 3FB88EDE00051417 for freebsd-isdn@freebsd.org; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 08:51:29 +0100 Received: from master.sse-erfurt.de (mailhost.sse-erfurt.de [192.105.75.4]) by mail.sse-erfurt.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7703812C83 for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 08:51:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from tycho.sse-erfurt.de (kittler@tycho.sse-erfurt.de [192.105.75.11])id IAA28162 for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 08:51:28 +0100 From: Lutz Kittler To: freebsd-isdn@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 08:51:27 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 References: <200311181733.hAIHXN4X096374@www.kukulies.org> <20031118223226.T17712@nihil.reifenberger.com> <20031118210148.GA98520@gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de> In-Reply-To: <20031118210148.GA98520@gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200311190851.27401.Lutz.Kittler@sse-erfurt.de> Subject: Re: how dangerous would it be to switch to 5.1-current? X-BeenThere: freebsd-isdn@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Using ISDN with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 07:51:32 -0000 Am Dienstag, 18. November 2003 22:01 schrieb Christoph P. Kukulies: > On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 10:36:39PM +0100, Michael Reifenberger wrote: > > On Tue, 18 Nov 2003, C. Kukulies wrote: > > > Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 18:33:23 +0100 (CET) > > > From: C. Kukulies > > > To: freebsd-isdn@freebsd.org > > > Subject: how dangerous would it be to switch to 5.1-current? > > > > > > With a gateway machine that runs 4.8 stable I'm considering to > > > switch to 5.1-current (cvsup) at the danger of being off-net > > > after the upgrade. Should I? > > > > Too dangerous. > > If you ask this question ('cause you havn't tried), you shouldn't > > upgrade. At least not to -current. Maybe RELENG_4. > > Well, I have gone through a couple of such situations in the past since > 386bsd :-) > > It's just the question whether i4b still works or works again > under -current. Under 5.0 there were problems due to timer changes > in the kernel. > > Is anybody running i4b under -current? > > -- > Chris Christoph P. U. Kukulies kuku_at_physik.rwth-aachen.de Hi, I am running 5.1 current with AVM Fritz PCI. No problems so far. lutz