Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2002 13:58:38 EST From: Ken Harrenstien <klh@panix.com> To: Alan Eldridge <alane@geeksrus.net> Cc: Ken Harrenstien <klh@panix.com>, Ken Stailey <kstailey@surfbest.net>, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: KLH10 port (was Re: [ade@FreeBSD.org: suggests installing in a USER's HOME dir]) Message-ID: <CMM.0.90.4.1013885918.klh@panix2.panix.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of Sat, 16 Feb 2002 13:01:16 -0500
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> This is essentially what I had suggested eons ago. Eh? Either I never got that, or it flew right out of my head while the kids were yanking for attention. Glad to hear it though. > The one big advantage this has is that the installer of ITS > doesn't have to have access to the ports tree. I think this is a > worthwhile consideration. The "fetch-its" script could be a simple > shell script that calls "fetch". I like this too. Sounds like things are in good hands. Let me know if you need help from the KLH10 side of things; a new version is in the works. --Ken To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CMM.0.90.4.1013885918.klh>