From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 11 18:18:21 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72FF87A5; Thu, 11 Sep 2014 18:18:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "wonkity.com", Issuer "wonkity.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22F30DA; Thu, 11 Sep 2014 18:18:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s8BIIH2x054595 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 11 Sep 2014 12:18:17 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) with ESMTP id s8BIIHF8054592; Thu, 11 Sep 2014 12:18:17 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 12:18:17 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Craig Rodrigues Subject: Re: /etc/motd summary In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (BSF 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Thu, 11 Sep 2014 12:18:17 -0600 (MDT) Cc: freebsd-arch X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 18:18:21 -0000 On Thu, 11 Sep 2014, Craig Rodrigues wrote: > On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 12:08 PM, Warren Block wrote: > >> >> http://www.wonkity.com/~wblock/motd/motd.whitespace-url >> >> >> > Can you go ahead and commit this, and then after 3 days submit > a request to re@ to MFC this to stable/10 so we can get this in 10.1? > > The suggestions brought up in this thread are good, but will take some time > to implement. Your changes to motd update the content to more current > sources of help, and do improve things a bit. It is good to get this in. Actually, I was going to commit the vertical version: http://www.wonkity.com/~wblock/motd/motd.vertical Nobody complained about it, and that's as good as downright approval in this thread.