Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 16:07:21 +0300 From: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org> To: Neil Blakey-Milner <nbm@mithrandr.moria.org> Cc: Jun Kuriyama <kuriyama@imgsrc.co.jp>, ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: PORTREVISION bumps on dependency changes (Was: Re: cvs commit: ports/print/freetype2 Makefile) Message-ID: <3B52E709.6514DEC1@FreeBSD.org> References: <200107121008.f6CA8iN37556@freefall.freebsd.org> <7mg0c05n3h.wl@waterblue.imgsrc.co.jp> <3B52CDFB.C125416@FreeBSD.org> <7mae253xxw.wl@waterblue.imgsrc.co.jp> <20010716134702.C10331@mithrandr.moria.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Neil Blakey-Milner wrote: > On Mon 2001-07-16 (20:39), Jun Kuriyama wrote: > > At Mon, 16 Jul 2001 14:20:27 +0300, > > Maxim Sobolev wrote: > > > I have already done it several minutes after upgrading freetype2. > > > > Ah, sorry. I missed that. > > > > BTW, is it reasonable to bump PORTREVISION for that case? > > If the dependencies change you _should_ bump PORTREVISION. If you bump > a library, you _must_ bump PORTREVISION on the dependencies. Nope, you shouldn't do it - it would be poinless. -Maxim To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3B52E709.6514DEC1>