From owner-freebsd-questions  Mon Sep 16 12:09:04 1996
Return-Path: owner-questions
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id MAA29020
          for questions-outgoing; Mon, 16 Sep 1996 12:09:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from jmb@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id MAA29013;
          Mon, 16 Sep 1996 12:09:03 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Jonathan M. Bresler" <jmb>
Message-Id: <199609161909.MAA29013@freefall.freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: SAMBA performance?
To: leisner@sdsp.mc.xerox.com (Marty Leisner)
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 1996 12:09:02 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu, nik@blueberry.co.uk, questions@FreeBSD.org
In-Reply-To: <9609161605.AA05952@gnu.sdsp.mc.xerox.com> from "Marty Leisner" at Sep 16, 96 09:05:54 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Marty Leisner wrote:
> 
> >un Samba and Win95 at the same time.
> > 
> > > The W95 machine will be running MS Access, and probably MS J++ as well, so
> > > I anticipate it being fairly IO bound.
> > 
> > Go SCSI, then.
> 
> Hmm...I'm not sure that's always the best advice.
> 
> I got a PB with a 1.2 mbyte IDE seagate and a 4 gig hawk (on an adaptec
> 1522).
  ^^^^_______ the reason your scsi performance is slow.

> 
> Turns  out I get about 3.5 mbtye/sec to the ide, and 1.5 mbyte/sec to the
> hawk.