From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 5 15:21:25 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E901B16A403; Sat, 5 May 2007 15:21:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A621113C455; Sat, 5 May 2007 15:21:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7E2C2093; Sat, 5 May 2007 17:21:21 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Tests: AWL X-Spam-Learn: disabled X-Spam-Score: 0.0/3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on tim.des.no Received: from dwp.des.no (des.no [80.203.243.180]) by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FDFB208C; Sat, 5 May 2007 17:21:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: by dwp.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 0FD36489B; Sat, 5 May 2007 17:21:21 +0200 (CEST) From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?utf-8?Q?Sm=C3=B8rgrav?=) To: Yar Tikhiy References: <200704260639.l3Q6d1SH027885@repoman.freebsd.org> <20070426105458.GA98415@nevermind.kiev.ua> <20070427162614.GG3991@comp.chem.msu.su> <20070428131748.GA51455@nevermind.kiev.ua> <20070428140247.GC14847@comp.chem.msu.su> Date: Sat, 05 May 2007 17:21:20 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20070428140247.GC14847@comp.chem.msu.su> (Yar Tikhiy's message of "Sat, 28 Apr 2007 18:02:47 +0400") Message-ID: <86ps5fqosv.fsf@dwp.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG, src-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libpam/modules/pam_unix pam_unix.8 pam_unix.c X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 May 2007 15:21:26 -0000 Yar Tikhiy writes: > The funny fact is that now sshd(8) behaves consistently, and it's > partly due to my change. [...] FWIW, although I was either too busy or too distracted to review Yar's patch when he submitted it in March: as the maintainer of both PAM and OpenSSH, I believe the patch is correct and I approve of Yar's commit. He has simply modified pam_unix(8) to behave in accordance with what was already documented in pw(8), long after OpenSSH was modified (by the vendor) to do so when not using PAM. I don't see that there's anything to argue about. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no