From owner-freebsd-alpha Tue Jul 2 19: 3:23 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57B4937B400 for ; Tue, 2 Jul 2002 19:03:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.web.de (smtp02.web.de [217.72.192.151]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C25DF43E0A for ; Tue, 2 Jul 2002 19:03:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Jan.Lentfer@web.de) Received: from [80.129.115.64] (helo=floundjan.homeip.net) by smtp.web.de with esmtp (WEB.DE(Exim) 4.70 #5) id 17PZUF-0000Ln-00; Wed, 03 Jul 2002 04:03:19 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost.lan [127.0.0.1]) by floundjan.homeip.net (Postfix on FreeBSD 4.5) with ESMTP id 5C1801D1; Wed, 3 Jul 2002 04:03:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from web.de (jan-winnb.lan [192.168.0.26]) by floundjan.homeip.net (Postfix on FreeBSD 4.5) with ESMTP id 222196F; Wed, 3 Jul 2002 04:03:15 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <3D225B13.7000004@web.de> Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2002 04:01:55 +0200 From: Jan Lentfer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; de-AT; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020530 X-Accept-Language: de-de, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Terry Lambert Cc: freebsd-alpha Subject: Re: List of ports that can be compiled with compaq-cc References: <3D21F1C8.2010708@web.de> <15650.6127.427432.57976@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <3D22188C.2000603@web.de> <3D222E25.62D5E4D0@mindspring.com> <3D222EF3.8070700@web.de> <3D223E91.A71CC743@mindspring.com> <3D224716.901@web.de> <3D2256E7.596D91F9@mindspring.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS perl-10 Sender: owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Terry Lambert schrieb: >Your original posting made an incorrect assumption, that what was >missing was the act of identification, and that such identification >would be persistant, or at least remain valid for a significant >period of time. > > There's your fault - my original posting didn't make any assumption at all - it was actually 2 sentences, one of them being a two word question sentence. It was the pure *idea*, a start off, call it what you want, but it sure wasn't the start off for a religious debate..... You are really overdoing things here - you are not helpfull, your postings rather seem pretty self-protrayal. Please, when you see postings of mine in the future- IGNORE THEM, I will kindly ignore yours, too Thanks, Jan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message