Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2012 01:54:19 +0200 From: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> Cc: current@freebsd.org, fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RFC: FUSE kernel module for the kernel... Message-ID: <20120308235419.GX75778@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-VmommsNZXLcY3dqftTVO1CEBh%2BOK1qHUvHS1FvYQvo2-m6g@mail.gmail.com> References: <C55C880E-8DA3-42A8-9837-32D4B02FD742@FreeBSD.org> <20120308225407.GV75778@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <CAJ-VmommsNZXLcY3dqftTVO1CEBh%2BOK1qHUvHS1FvYQvo2-m6g@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--+kSsdclgAHMo6YVP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 03:43:42PM -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote: > Hi, >=20 > Is there any reason why we shouldn't throw this into contrib/ and > treating it like a vendor thing? > Or is this explicitly not being treated as a vendor FS? No idea. This should be a decision of the person who imports the filesystem. >=20 > Other than that, sure, let's get it into the tree and then thrash it > until it's stable.. No, please fix at least the dreadful bugs before committing. We have enough dead and buggy filesystems in the tree already. The problem with fusefs code is the lack of maintainer, and not the location of the code. --+kSsdclgAHMo6YVP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk9ZRqsACgkQC3+MBN1Mb4g6lgCgnu1X77uFOKvQZTy5Gfe2UZ1k 3wcAoOZOFuYbvX9l4XE5/pcpwFovYW8y =Ohar -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --+kSsdclgAHMo6YVP--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120308235419.GX75778>