From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 8 20:05:00 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14AFB16A4CE for ; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 20:05:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from bes.amduat.net (bes.amduat.net [206.124.149.190]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A647143D39 for ; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 20:04:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jbarrett@amduat.net) Received: from osiris.amduat.net (osiris.amduat.net [10.0.0.69]) (AUTH: LOGIN jbarrett, SSL: TLSv1/SSLv3,128bits,RC4-MD5) by bes.amduat.net with esmtp; Mon, 08 Mar 2004 20:04:58 -0800 From: "Jacob S. Barrett" To: Julian Elischer Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 15:53:58 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.6 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200403081553.58502.jbarrett@amduat.net> cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Solution for Resilient VLAN Trunk Bonding X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2004 04:05:00 -0000 I have some questions about the ng_fec. Would it work if each interface was connected to a different switch? Everything I have read on the list says that they done it only with having "trunking" enabled on the switch as well. I don't see how you could do that across two switches. If no one has an answer I guess I can give it a try at home. I have two really crappy 3Com SuperStack II switches. -- Jacob S. Barrett jbarrett@amduat.net www.amduat.net "I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it."