From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Jun 11 16: 3: 8 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from resnet.uoregon.edu (resnet.uoregon.edu [128.223.144.32]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6282A14F79 for ; Fri, 11 Jun 1999 16:03:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu) Received: from localhost (dwhite@localhost) by resnet.uoregon.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA23812; Fri, 11 Jun 1999 16:03:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu) Date: Fri, 11 Jun 1999 16:03:03 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug White To: Arcady Genkin Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: kernel recompilation question In-Reply-To: <87u2sesqsm.fsf@main.wgaf.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 11 Jun 1999, Arcady Genkin wrote: > Suppose I compile a kernel. Then I decide that I want, for example > change an IRQ for a networking card, or add a flag for a hard-disk > controller. > > The question is -- should I still do the "configure" and "make depend" > steps or can I go straight to "make", provided no options and/or > devices have been added? As suggested previously, use boot -c. For future reference, however, if you make changes the kernel config file you _must_ run 'config' to affect these changes the the kernel build directory. > This is important for me b/c it takes 4 hours overall to compile a > kernel on my 486, so if I can save 30 min for skipping "make depend", > that would make me a bit happier. 4 hours?!? Just what are you building? On our 486/25sx it takes ~45 minutes. It's a decently pruned kernel, though. Doug White Internet: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu | FreeBSD: The Power to Serve http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~dwhite | www.freebsd.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message