From owner-freebsd-www Wed Apr 25 11:15:30 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-www@freebsd.org Received: from sj-msg-core-4.cisco.com (sj-msg-core-4.cisco.com [171.71.163.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B088A37B42C; Wed, 25 Apr 2001 11:15:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bmah@cisco.com) Received: from bmah-freebsd-0.cisco.com (bmah-freebsd-0.cisco.com [171.70.84.42]) by sj-msg-core-4.cisco.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA04572; Wed, 25 Apr 2001 11:15:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from bmah@localhost) by bmah-freebsd-0.cisco.com (8.11.3/8.11.1) id f3PIFKx56080; Wed, 25 Apr 2001 11:15:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bmah) Message-Id: <200104251815.f3PIFKx56080@bmah-freebsd-0.cisco.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.3.1 01/19/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Nik Clayton Cc: www@FreeBSD.ORG, dd@FreeBSD.ORG, doc@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: rel.current entity for www/en a la Handbook In-Reply-To: <20010425104400.A81151@canyon.nothing-going-on.org> References: <20010425080356.D33653E2C@bazooka.unixfreak.org> <20010425104400.A81151@canyon.nothing-going-on.org> Comments: In-reply-to Nik Clayton message dated "Wed, 25 Apr 2001 10:44:00 +0100." From: "Bruce A. Mah" Reply-To: bmah@FreeBSD.ORG X-Face: g~c`.{#4q0"(V*b#g[i~rXgm*w;:nMfz%_RZLma)UgGN&=j`5vXoU^@n5v4:OO)c["!w)nD/!!~e4Sj7LiT'6*wZ83454H""lb{CC%T37O!!'S$S&D}sem7I[A 2V%N&+ X-Image-Url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/Images/bmah-cisco-small.gif X-Url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/ Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_1739813856P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2001 11:15:20 -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-www@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org --==_Exmh_1739813856P Content-Type: multipart/mixed ; boundary="==_Exmh_17349746090" This is a multipart MIME message. --==_Exmh_17349746090 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii If memory serves me right, Nik Clayton wrote: > On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 01:03:56AM -0700, Dima Dorfman wrote: > > In order to simplify trasitioning from one release to another, I think > > the web site could use an entity similar to &rel.current; that the > > Handbook uses. From looking at includes.sgml it looks like something > > like this has been attempted (see a.latest.ann and a.latest.not > > entities), but died off (the aforementioned entities still point to > > 3.4!). Just for kicks, here's what RELNOTESng uses (see attachment), modulo things like a $FreeBSD$ tag and some whitespace fixes. > I think we should standardise these across the doc/ and www/ trees. That sounds pretty reasonable. One thought I have is that RELNOTESng, which will live in src/, may need to be kept separate because it's branched (in the CVS sense) and doc/ and www/ are not. So I'd like to either use differently-named entities or else have the ability to avoid including the file that defines the release-related entities but still include some others (such as the committers, manpages, etc.). Does this sound workable, or is there something I'm missing? Thanks, Bruce. --==_Exmh_17349746090 Content-Type: text/plain ; name="release.ent"; charset=us-ascii Content-Description: release.ent --==_Exmh_17349746090-- --==_Exmh_1739813856P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: Exmh version 2.2 06/23/2000 iD8DBQE65xQ42MoxcVugUsMRAiSMAKDfaR/Pu62fnu3w4FnBQM2Cw9DwuwCcDEat YyiZ4Kt6M25ZOkZYCj3/UVU= =b4jJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_1739813856P-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-www" in the body of the message