Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2002 15:50:27 +0200 From: Ernst de Haan <znerd@FreeBSD.org> To: Tadayuki OKADA <tadayuki@attbi.com>, Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net> Cc: tadayuki.okada@windriver.com, sobomax@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: make clean install clean Message-ID: <200204131350.PAA22744@smtp.hccnet.nl> In-Reply-To: <20020413095148.20e41fd3.tadayuki@attbi.com> References: <3CAE0E7A.87254F95@windriver.com> <20020413112140.B40206@straylight.oblivion.bg> <20020413095148.20e41fd3.tadayuki@attbi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--------------Boundary-00=_3GEI22JQ3DCQO19ILW3Q
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Tadayuki-SAN,
> Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net> wrote:
> > I do not think 'broken' is the proper word to use; it's just the way
> > make(1) works. When you pass it a 'clean install clean' list of targets,
> > it first 'makes' the 'clean' target, then the 'install' target, then..
> > then it considers 'making' the 'clean' target, and finds out that it has
> > already been 'made'; it ought to be up-to-date.
> >
> > The way I do it is 'make clean all install && make clean'.
>
> But it worked before sobomax's bsd.port.mk speed-up change.
Are you sure? I don't think so. Try this simple Makefile:
a:
@echo a
b:
@echo b
And then execute 'make a b a'. The output is, as I expected:
ernst@heinz$ make a b a
a
b
ernst@heinz$
This is default make(1) behaviour. It should not be necessary to document it.
Sincerely,
Ernst
--------------Boundary-00=_3GEI22JQ3DCQO19ILW3Q
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1";
name="Makefile"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="Makefile"
YToKCUBlY2hvIGEKYjoKCUBlY2hvIGIK
--------------Boundary-00=_3GEI22JQ3DCQO19ILW3Q--
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200204131350.PAA22744>