Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 11:48:53 -0500 From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Cc: Olivier =?iso-8859-1?q?Cochard-Labb=E9?= <olivier@cochard.me>, "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>, andre@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Regression on 10-RC5 with a multicast routing daemon Message-ID: <201401211148.53400.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20140115113430.GK26504@FreeBSD.org> References: <CA%2Bq%2BTcpFs_vff-r5e-Hw=F7QvGLc-9HGM-vm5TB1C4zik%2B0d8A@mail.gmail.com> <20140115113430.GK26504@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wednesday, January 15, 2014 6:34:30 am Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > Damn, what a mess. I'd like to go towards absolutely unmodified packets > for the 11-release cycle. I agree. -- John Baldwin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201401211148.53400.jhb>