Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 15 Jul 1996 12:34:42 -0400
From:      ALHACK@am.pnu.com
To:        terry@lambert.org, James Raynard <fqueries@jraynard.demon.co.uk>
Cc:        nate@mt.sri.com, gpalmer@freebsd.org, questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re[2]: FreeBSD vs. Caldera Linux
Message-ID:  <1ea74950@am.pnu.com>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thank you everyone for the answers and including me in the discussion.

Art


______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: FreeBSD vs. Caldera Linux
Author:  James Raynard <fqueries@jraynard.demon.co.uk> at INTERNET
Date:    07/09/96 02:29 PM


> > Lots.  Maybe 'touched' was a poor word.  Many files were 'fixed' in the 
> > 2.1 -> 2.1.5 upgrade, but very few new features were added, and a couple 
> > of them shouldn't have been (/dev/random stuff).  The ELF stuff is *new* 
> > code, and as such doesn't fit the bill for the 'target' of the stable
> > release.
>
> OK, I can accept this.  It means that there is really little value 
> in 2.1.5R vs. 2.1R (from my personal point of view, anyway), but it 
> is a solid, rational position.

There probably isn't much of interest to kernel hackers in 2.1.5 - 
it's aimed mainly at users who want to have existing bugs fixed 
without new ones being introduced at the same time :-)

> > > I don't think a "weight of printout" argument is really applicable in 
> > > this case.
> >
> > It certainly is.  The 'weight of printout' implies that the code is both 
> > new *and* fairly untested on a large scale.
>
> No, it implies that the "number of files touched" is an arbiter of 
> whether or not a change is a good one or not.

The question is one of stability, not of value judgments. I don't 
believe anyone is arguing that large changes are automatically bad, 
just that it takes longer for them to settle down sufficiently to be 
made available in a release.

--
James Raynard, Edinburgh, Scotland
james@jraynard.demon.co.uk
http://www.freebsd.org/~jraynard/



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1ea74950>