Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2005 00:50:15 +0400 From: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org> To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern kern_mutex.c Message-ID: <20050408205015.GA84134@cell.sick.ru> In-Reply-To: <20050409002141.V48108@delplex.bde.org> References: <200504081414.j38EE9OC051194@repoman.freebsd.org> <20050409002141.V48108@delplex.bde.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 01:16:51AM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote: B> This is bogus, as is the existence of sysctls that format data (*). B> Use "sysctl -n debug.mutex.prof.stats" if you don't want sysctl(8)'s B> printing of the sysctl name to mess up the header. The new newline B> misformats output for this usage. B> B> (*) Formatted output is not too bad for sysctls in the debug tree, but B> for general-purpose sysctls it is just a bug. We already have formatted output here, don't we? Why just don't get it formatted correctly? If you insist on userland app to parse and format MUTEX_PROFILING(9) statistics, then you should be consistent and remove the header _at all_. Anyway, I see you, phk and jhb involved in discussion. I'm out of it. If you together decide, that header format should be broken again, then I'll back it out and be happy with local change in my tree. That's all, I don't want to be involved in this flame. -- Totus tuus, Glebius. GLEBIUS-RIPN GLEB-RIPE
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050408205015.GA84134>