Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2018 10:28:19 -0700 From: Yuri <yuri@freebsd.org> To: Mathieu Arnold <mat@freebsd.org> Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r464842 - head/devel/py-black Message-ID: <b9be60c5-52e4-2c88-9d12-1d6c57830bbd@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20180320081257.3e42eqdvrxnyyx6w@atuin.in.mat.cc> References: <201803171854.w2HIsD3u010171@repo.freebsd.org> <20180320081257.3e42eqdvrxnyyx6w@atuin.in.mat.cc>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 03/20/18 01:12, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
> This was not a mistake, it was the correct way to do it. Using
> PY_FLAVOR is more robust because it will always contain the Python
> flavor.
Should python ports always use @${PY_FLAVOR} then?
Yuri
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?b9be60c5-52e4-2c88-9d12-1d6c57830bbd>